You sign up with them and choose classes from their course
offerings to meet graduation requirements. This is kind of like choosing from
the menu at a restaurant. They keep records and issue grades and a diploma.
Pros:
You
get a diploma from an institution with a campus school.
They
do the planning work and ensure a proper course, scope, sequence, and
requirements.
They
will keep you and your child accountable.
Parental
time involvement is less. Little planning.
Parent
just helps and then tests student.
They
do all of the documentation work for you.
Cons:
You
are locked into the school’s time frame.
You
are stuck with the school’s course outline, methods, textbooks, etc.
The
course offerings may not meet your child’s individual needs.
Your
student cannot study their interests in any more depth than the school has
course work.
They
might not permit early graduation.
In this and the following options, it would be helpful to
think of the parent and student as education brokers. They are the ones
ultimately in charge, and they find courses and experts to help them put
together an academic program. In this particular option, you pay to take all of
your courses from Correspondence Schools. You could take all of the courses
from one institution, or you could choose courses from several different
correspondence schools. When you put all of the course work together, you would
have a complete high school program. This is like ordering from the menu at a
Chinese restaurant (one from column A and two from column B…) or eating dinner
at the Mall. You have lots of options to choose from.
Pros:
You
have more freedom and flexibility in course offerings.
You
can choose courses to meet your student’s individual needs.
You
could provide more in-depth study in areas your student wishes to pursue.
You
could allow early graduation and transition into textbooks.
You
are locked into the schools’ time frame for each course.
You
have to keep the final records, send transcripts, and issue the diploma.
Parent
can feel confident that the school has put together an adequate scope and
sequence — especially in areas that the parent does not feel competent to
teach.
The
school might supply telephone “tutoring.”
Cons:
You
still have to choose from courses available through correspondence programs.
You can’t “do your own thing.”
The
schools provide documentation concerning each course your student takes.
You
are still stuck with a school’s scope and sequence, methods, course outline,
the workplace, vocational school, or college.
While
working on a course, you are accountable to the correspondence school.
Parental
involvement is limited to helping and testing.
1. Costs per course. Are textbooks
included? Can you return the course if you decide that you do not like it? Will
you get a full refund?
2. What support services do I get for
my money? Can I call a teacher? Is there a toll-free or local line to talk to a
teacher?
3. How do they handle tests? Do they
provide answer keys? After taking a test do you just go on? Or do you have to
wait until the test is returned to go on to the next level? Who grades the test
— a teacher or a graduate assistant? Are they machine or hand scored? Do you
get feedback about what you did not understand, or do you only get the test
score returned? If the student fails a test, can they retake it?
4. What is the range of courses
offered? Do you ever get a choice of textbooks? What about secular world views
in materials? Will that bother you? Does the school’s religious/philosophical
point of view match yours? Does that matter to you?
5. How long is your student given to
complete the course? Is getting a time extension an option? Can they work
through the summer?
6. How well can they work to
accommodate your child’s special needs/learning styles/vocational choices? Is
there any flexibility at all? Do you need flexibility?
7. Will the school issue a diploma?
Can you buy just one course? Can you do most of your course work with them and
NOT be issued a diploma?
For High School Correspondence Schools/Courses, click here.
This is a combination of the options directly before and
after this one. You can choose courses from a variety of Correspondence
Schools, and still have the freedom to design your own courses where desirable.
This reminds me of eating out by driving through Taco Bell, Burger King, and
Hardee’s, and then taking the food home, where YOU add drinks and dessert from
your refrigerator.
Pros:
You
have more freedom and flexibility in course offerings.
You
can choose or design courses to meet your student’s individual needs.
You
could provide more in-depth study in areas student wishes to pursue.
You
could allow early graduation and transition into the workplace, vocational
school, or college.
You
are only stuck with a school’s scope and sequence, methods, course outline,
textbooks.
Cons:
You
have to keep records to document scope and sequence, study hours, grades and
testing.
You
have to know what you are doing.
When
you design the course, there is no one to keep you accountable to follow
through as you planned.
You
have to keep final records, send transcripts, and issue the diploma.
You
are locked into the school’s time frame for each correspondence course you
take.
There is a high level of parent involvement.
You
can get pre-planned courses when they fit your needs.
Do Your Own Thing School
(refer to Homeschooling
the High Schooler – vol. 1 & 2, by
McAlister.)
In this option, you and your student design their
coursework. Not only do you choose courses, you choose and design the scope and
sequence for the courses, and the methods and textbooks to be used. The parent
might plan the course, or the student might. If necessary, the family might pay
a “teacher/tutor” to design the course. The school could give credit for work
experience, apprenticeship, travel, etc. This option I liken to cooking at
home. You choose from ingredients you have available at home and if you are
missing an ingredient, you go out shopping to buy it.
Pros:
You
have the maximum amount of freedom and flexibility.
You
can most effectively meet the needs of the individual student with this option.
You
can provide plenty of opportunity for in-depth study.
Early
graduation, apprenticeship, vocational school, and work experience credit are
easier to provide.
The
student learns to take more responsibility for their learning since they are
involved in the planning.
You
set the time frame.
Cons:
This
option takes a lot of planning time.
The
parent is very involved in the courses.
There is no school providing accountability to you — to ensure that you follow
through on your plans.
Parent
has to feel competent to design a course or hire another “teacher.”
Parents
needs to learn how to plan, document courses, keep detailed records, etc.
Parent
issues the diploma.
Unschooling
(refer to: Real Lives: Eleven
Teenagers Who Don’t Go To School, by Grace
Llewellyn)
Unschooling is the educational philosophy advocated by John
Holt. In this option, the student is set free to choose and study whatever they
are interested in. They can study on their own, take a few correspondent courses,
do an apprenticeship, start a business, get a job … This doesn’t mean that
there is NO structure to the learning. It simply means that the student sets
the structure. If the parent sees an area of weakness that the student is not
addressing in their learning, then the parent can step in and help the student
find a way to address that issue. The student takes the responsibility for
learning, so they generally study in-depth. Since no attempt at a traditional
high school experience is even attempted, the parent does not have to
understand pre-college curriculum, etc. Any records needing to be kept should
be kept by the student in the form of a file and journals. To use the dinner
analogy once again, this is like letting your student loose to plan and make
Christmas dinner. They may have to practice some, do a little research, etc.
They could buy ingredients from the store, use what is in the cupboard, ask
“Aunt Jane” to bring something, and even buy part of the meal already made.
They would choose the menu, plan and cook the meal.
Pros:
The
student is self-motivated and learns eagerly.
This
produces an individual, not a public school clone.
Student
develops a love of learning and sees learning as a part of real life.
They
learn the self-starter skills needed to succeed in real life.
Parental
involvement is less.
Student
doesn’t have time to get bored, so they do not get involved in negative
cultural activities.
These
students go through the experiences that produce success, confidence, and good
self-esteem.
Cons:
No scope and sequence to learning a specific body of knowledge. But is that really necessary?
They receive no diploma or college prep courses to show to a college admissions officer.
But, plenty of real life experiences will impress the admissions office also especially at a top-notch institution.
Summary:
All of these options could be joined with a co-op approach between several families.They could share the teaching load (Family A teaches math, Family B teaches science, and Family C teaches English to all of the students in families, A, B & C). Or they could form a class from all of their students, and pool their money to hire a teacher/tutor for the class. The teacher could teach all of part of the course.
Return to Homeschooler Highschoolers